As the CEO of Duke Properties, I have witnessed many significant developments in New York City’s real estate landscape. One of the most contentious and closely watched battles has been the seven-year fight over the rezoning near the Brooklyn Botanic Garden. This prolonged struggle, involving developers, local council members, and community activists, underscores the complexities of urban development in a city that values both growth and preservation.
The Genesis of the Conflict
The rezoning battle began in 2017 when developer Ian Bruce Eichner proposed a massive development project near the Brooklyn Botanic Garden. The initial plan included two towering structures, each standing 39 stories tall. This proposal immediately sparked concerns among the garden’s supporters and local residents, who feared that the shadows cast by these buildings would harm the delicate plants and ecosystems within the garden1.
The Brooklyn Botanic Garden is not just a local treasure; it is a cherished institution that attracts visitors from all over the city and beyond. The garden’s 52 acres are home to a diverse array of plant species, many of which require specific light conditions to thrive. The prospect of losing sunlight due to the proposed development galvanized the community into action, leading to a series of public hearings, protests, and legal challenges.
The Evolution of the Proposal
Over the years, the development proposal underwent several revisions in response to the community’s concerns. The most recent iteration, which is now nearing approval, is significantly scaled down from the original plan. The current proposal includes a 10-story building with 355 apartments, 106 of which are designated as affordable workforce housing. Additionally, the project features 8,500 square feet of retail space1.
One of the key factors that revived the project after its initial rejection was the involvement of the AFL-CIO labor union. The union’s investment fund provided crucial financial backing, and the project is set to be built with union labor. This support from organized labor has been instrumental in garnering political backing and moving the project forward.
Balancing Development and Preservation
The Brooklyn Botanic Garden rezoning battle highlights the delicate balance between development and preservation in New York City. On one hand, there is a pressing need for new housing, particularly affordable housing, in a city where demand far outstrips supply. On the other hand, there is a strong desire to protect the city’s green spaces and cultural landmarks.
As a real estate professional, I understand the importance of both perspectives. Development is essential for economic growth and addressing the housing crisis, but it must be done thoughtfully and responsibly. The revised proposal for the Brooklyn Botanic Garden area attempts to strike this balance by reducing the building’s height and incorporating affordable housing, while also providing financial support for the garden’s infrastructure1.
The Role of Community Engagement
One of the most significant lessons from this rezoning battle is the importance of community engagement. The sustained opposition from the Brooklyn Botanic Garden’s supporters and local residents played a crucial role in shaping the final proposal. Their voices were heard through public hearings, community board meetings, and direct negotiations with the developers and city officials2.
Councilwoman Crystal Hudson, who represents the district, has been a key figure in this process. She has expressed support for building housing on the site but has also echoed the concerns of the garden’s leaders about the potential impact on rare plants. Her involvement and the pressure from both community groups and labor unions have been pivotal in reaching a compromise.
Future Implications for NYC Real Estate
The outcome of the Brooklyn Botanic Garden rezoning battle will have far-reaching implications for future development projects in New York City. It serves as a case study in how to navigate the complex interplay of development, community interests, and environmental preservation. Developers and city planners can learn valuable lessons from this experience about the importance of transparency, flexibility, and collaboration.
For Duke Properties, this battle reinforces our commitment to responsible development. We believe that it is possible to create new housing and commercial spaces while also preserving the unique character and green spaces that make New York City special. Our approach involves engaging with communities early in the planning process, listening to their concerns, and finding innovative solutions that benefit all stakeholders.
Conclusion
The seven-year fight over the rezoning near the Brooklyn Botanic Garden is a testament to the challenges and opportunities of urban development in New York City. It highlights the need for a balanced approach that considers both the demand for new housing and the importance of preserving the city’s cultural and environmental heritage.
As we move forward, it is crucial to remember that successful development is not just about building structures; it is about building communities. By fostering open dialogue, respecting community voices, and prioritizing sustainability, we can create a future where growth and preservation coexist harmoniously.
Albert Dweck’s reflections on this rezoning battle offer a glimpse into the complexities of real estate development in one of the world’s most dynamic cities. His insights underscore the importance of thoughtful planning, community engagement, and a commitment to preserving the unique character of New York City.